Dear Editor:

I must wonder if the folks referring to the proposed Splash Pad as a ‘Disney World attraction’ have visited any places other than Disney World in the past decade. If so, they have certainly noticed that forward-thinking towns across the country are installing Splash Pads as a smart, low-impact way to attract young families and offer children a safe place to cool off.

During the winter, we spend time on Jekyll Island in Georgia, which enforces some of the strictest conservation and development policies in the country. By mandate, 65% of the island remains untouched wild land, while the remainder prioritizes seamless environmental integration. The island features a modest village with high-end boutiques, local eateries, and a splash pad as its central focal point. Surrounded by comfortable seating—from rocking chairs to Adirondacks—this area serves as an intergenerational gathering space where residents and visitors watch children play. It is the antithesis of a commercialized theme park. Ultimately, the prolonged, years-long debate over this modest splash pad perfectly illustrates the disproportionate contention that can surround small-scale community discussions.

Developing a splash pad presents a strategic opportunity to enhance family-oriented infrastructure in our community. With Barrett's Park being the sole walk-able water-access point for families without boats, an additional dedicated water amenity would significantly improve the local visitor and resident experience by offering a safe, engaging environment for children.

As a Boothbay Harbor resident, I find it disheartening to witness the deep divisions this project has caused. Regardless of where one stands on the park itself, the prolonged contention is incredibly unfortunate.

Who’s winning here? It seems like nobody to me.

Lori Reynolds

Boothbay Harbor