Boothbay Harbor rejects controversial housing amendment

$4.29 million town budget passes
Tue, 05/09/2023 - 8:45am

    Boothbay Harbor failed to pass an article tied to a controversial state law aimed at tackling Maine’s housing crisis. At the annual town meeting May 6 at the fire house, the other 21 articles passed, including the proposed $4,289,558 million town budget for 2024.

    The budget increased almost 7.5%, or $298,000 from last year’s, largely due to the increased cost of labor, services and goods, according to Town Manager Julia Latter. Latter said the town “remains in excellent fiscal shape.” 

    Residents paid the most attention to Article 22, which was tied to Maine law LD 2003. Enacted in 2022, LD 2003 mandates certain actions for local governments around housing and requires all Maine municipalities to incorporate the law into their ordinances by July 1.

    “It was a contentious and difficult-to-understand piece of legislation,” said Selectmen’s Chair Michael Tomko. “I expected there would be quite a bit of debate ... I worry about putting the town at risk by not having this approved.”

    The failed article represents the town’s rejection of the language into the Boothbay Harbor land use code. That rejection could lead to complications: “We wouldn’t be adhering to the law. So, we would have some problems down the line if (someone was) applying for an accessory dwelling unit and we prohibited them from doing that,” said Code Enforcement Officer Geoff Smith. “We would probably have legal issues down the road, and we would not be supported in that position."
     
    Smith said his role is to follow the town’s position when evaluating buildings, and it is hard to predict what kind of issues would arise if there were conflicts between local ordinance and the state law.
     
    Under LD 2003, local governments may not enact ordinances that allow housing but limit it to one unit per lot or limit some affordable housing density bonuses. In addition, it forbids local governments from prohibiting one accessory dwelling unit (ADU) per lot. ADUs are smaller units which may be attached, within, or separate from the primary unit.
     
    Before the vote, residents who spoke generally agreed the housing crisis is an issue the town needs to address.
     
    “Whether we pass this or not, what I’m hearing from residents is that we want something done about housing. We don't want to keep talking about it,” said Wendy Wolf, who was co-chair of the Boothbay-Boothbay Harbor Joint Economic Development Committee. “This is a pressing, pressing issue. We will be a town of retired people with no workers here unless we develop concrete steps."
     

    However, voters raised concern the ADUs and other parts of the amendment would not be enough to solve the town’s housing problems.

    Some said small ADUs would not be large enough to attract workers. Others said the language does not prevent the additional living structures from being used as short-term rentals or at unaffordable rates.

    “If we vote for this law today, I plan to vote no. Not because I don’t like affordable housing, but I think the bill is not well worded. I think there are lots of issues. All plans don’t fit Boothbay Harbor and also Portland, Maine. This plan is just too universal,” said Jon Dunsford of west Boothbay Harbor. His comment received applause.

    Voters also expressed concern the state is overreaching. Planning Board Chair Tom Churchill spoke on his own behalf and said the bill bypasses local ordinances. Churchill was not alone in his opinion.

    “I have an atavistic rejection of this top-down approach from the state of Maine,” said resident John O'Connell. “One size does not fit all and, if there is no real penalty to hold off, I don't have a problem with it ... I just see it putting us into absolute turmoil and we'd be struggling with this and have the state looking over our shoulders for years.”

    Article 20 passed, which adjusts the zoning of Boothbay Harbor Memorial Library, Bath Savings Bank and a nearby town parking lot to be included in zoning with neighboring downtown properties. The article also adjusts parking standards in the district so that additional parking demands are not required.

    Article 21 also passed, clarifying that the role of the Board of Appeals is to review planning board and code enforcement officer decisions based on the record of evidence presented at the time of the original decision.

    In other action, the fire department received the Spirit of America award for its service.

    “It's hard to imagine a more selfless and devoted awardee as our fire department,” said Tomko as he presented the award. “The fire department has always been a cornerstone of this community.”